(1861-1917) This period saw the development of moderninfrastructure, mainly in urban European Russia, ofroads/piping/government buildings, and railroads, all financed almost entirely by either France, Germany, England, or the U.S.A., or somegrouping of these depending on the alliances in place at the time. (*KEY*) The monarchy was ALWAYS weak financially during thisperiod, as a result of the self-financed Moscow-St. PetersbergRailway during the 1840’s and then, the Crimean War. (*KEY*)Russia in this time became the world’s first great deficit spender. Foreign lenders were drawn by collateralizing Russia’s rich naturalresources and, for a period herein, an adherence to a goldstandard---but there was never any real accountability regarding howmoney was spent and no firm government planning. Militarily, thefocus was first on Turkey (warm water ports, stable textileproduction) but when the western powers jointly annulled thatsuccess, the emphasis was on central Asia and the brand-new FarEast. The need for capital, plus the weakening of its navy post-Crimean War combined with England’s presence in Canada and therapid development of the Far East, made it feasible to sell Alaska toits ally, the U.S.A. When Russia tried to expand its railroad-facilitated influence in the Far East near to the Korean Peninsula andonto the Yellow Sea, the Japanese (with some counselling from theBritish, which didn’t like the prospect of Asian product going toEurope via the new Russian railroad system instead of their fleet)attacked in 1904 and Russia was soundly defeated. Already, by thistime populism and socialist revolutionary forces had already beenextant for about 35 years, and this little Russo-Japanese War wasthe catalyst that set Russia on a path towards constitutionalmonarchy to pacify the overall populous. Also in 1905, another 45-year-old problem came to a crisis point: the freedom-of-the-serfsland deal, having originated as follows in 1861: 1. Serfs freed. 2. The Tsar bought land (another huge financial burden added to thoseabove) from various private owners (on which only some of the serfshad been living) and 3. The Tsar sold it to the serfs, figuratively, ona 100% credit basis. The serfs didn’t get the best lands, of course. The serfs had been paying back, continuously, with no end in sight,as terms and conditions changed. The Tsar dealt with this in 2 mainways in 1905, aided by most likely Russia’s most brilliant civilservant ever, Stolypin: 1. Allowing the consolidation/privatization offarms under the ownership and management of serf-descendanttalent, with favorable debt restructuring. 2. Shipping off manyfarmers off to Siberia on the newly-completed Trans-Siberian
Railway with offers of free land and subsidies. At this time, the Tsar alsogrudgingly accepted a constitution. No one was happy because (*KEY*) the wordcompromise doesn’t function in Russia, so a general major weakening of societalinfrastructures commenced, as bureaucracies, etc., attacked each other while tryingto maintain their status under modified rules. Two other financial drains are worthmentioning: 1. The payment of a large bribe to the Chinese to help settle theSino-Japanese conflict of 1895. A condition of this was that Russia could build/owna direct rail route across northern China, between Chita and Vladivostok. 2. 4years earlier, at the beginning time-wise of Trans-Siberian construction, Russia self-financed a railroad link between Vladivostok and Khabarovsk. As might have beenexpected, by the eve of ww-1 Russia was the number 1 agricultural force in theworld but the constant weakening of society brought on by conflict between thevarious factions considerably offset this new stature in importance. Let’s not forgetabout debt service obligations as the number of bonds just kept on growing. WorldWar I accelerated this overall weakening process and this multi-dysfunctionalmonarchy collapsed (the 4th constitution was thrown out in 1911) in its sea of debt in 1917.